http://www.thefotofanatic.com/Photography/Forums/Your-Bris bane-Past/i-JP7VGmG/0/O/Bellevue%20Hotel%201903_141770.jpg |
We've had many very unique and beautiful buildings demolished (Bellevue Hotel) in the name of progress that in all fairness where great examples of heritage; whereas on this site, there is an older facade, and one from the 70's both is tremendous dis-repair and both have been hacked up and edited in their time so I don't understand how this is something that should be kept in order to keep "Historic significant buildings" in Brisbane.
It does not make sense. Why would keeping 2/3rd's of a facade be at all a good indication of a historic building. Whereas if they were to keep the whole building or at the very least the whole facade; I would understand but to say that you can keep some of it but not all and ignore using the facade in your building for anything but a bit of wall candy seems quite obsolete.
No comments:
Post a Comment