TED talks: Framework Design & Augmented Reality


I just watched this TED talk by Kent Larson [1] about adaptable spaces, shared city cars and changing urban infrastructure to fit the future city. 

It was exactly what technology I imagine a city of the future could use; rather than relying on materials, it uses power to do things, and saves on city space and the it could instead use that space for more population.



It discusses the idea of my building that I create a framework, and the consumer fits it out how they want to use it; with various infill options that reduce materials and are reusable.


I think this is the idea I will be exploring further, buildings and cities that are more walk-able, but also, increase the density to reduce materials.

But also i found a TED talk by Matt Mills [2] about augmented reality that are used by phones, but as the Google glass project shows, it could easily become a more everyday device like glasses to change the view of the world around.  It uses auras of particular things, such as paintings, pictures, or scenes and then adds an overlay of information.  

http://wttfuture.wordpress.com/tag/layar/
So a look at a city, each building could provide a trigger to share more information about whatever the consumer wants to know about, whether it be the history of the site or building, the retail or commercial contents, whether your friend who lives on the 5th floor is home; anything can be shown and I think that could be a powerful tool for people in getting immersed in their world, how they want to.

So the future is not science fiction, but rather, today's technology which in itself is an adaption, being adapted for a more seamless and integrated, augmented reality.

Reference:

The facade.



With the need for complex shading/insulation systems, the glass tower is free from clutter that is raw and clean.  With only mullions blocking the open spaces within.

Internally lit, it is a beacon in a city of mostly low-rise, the start of a new future for Brisbane perhaps?  This is what 42 Elizabeth street could be; or at least if energy was free.  Well, at least for now, this is what I think it could be.

I think the internal working of the building would be less open planned tho, but using a grid system that divided the space up into units that can be spanned, or separated into anything.  Not just a primarily residential space, it will have commercial, office, retail and manufacturing spread throughout the building with potentially other facilities such as schools and such as well in the tower.

The Rebirth of the Glass Tower.

If energy is limitless, the current view of glass towers wasting energy become obselete.  In short, burn the HVAC and lighting and rather, concentrate to minimize material use.

http://www.lowtechmagazine.com/2008/10/led-light-cfl-b.html 
So the glass tower is reborn as a saviour of humanity, using an abundant sorce of material, glass, which due to the almost limitless nature of sand, and its unlimited recyclability, it becomes the material of choice.


Due to the total immersion of the augmentation technology, we dont really need customisable facades and more rely on each person's augmented vision.  So facades like the one on the right, however the idea that glass could become opaque, and used as a digital wall is very likely in interior fitouts, as when in your own space, augments become obsolete as you can customise your own space easily, especially through digital means.

http://studio630.tumblr.com/post/16142702702/transsolar-a-jont-venture-of-phillips-and-basf 
So the idea that internal walls would be glass that can be changed through digital means is quite posible, however the exterior facades of buildings are now more changed by peoples augments, and therefor, the real fabric of the city become a blank canvas to paint your own persona on a city.

http://dornob.com/unbelievably-realistic-3d-building-facade-projection-art/?ref=search 

A city-wide canvas for digital artists to paint, for people to download, for people to experience.  So in creating a blank canvas of a city to save material resources and rather rely on individual manipulation of the city through digital means create a market for digital artists and designers alike to sell there vision of a city, whether it be limited to a building, a street, or the city as a whole. 

How amazing would a city like that be?

A Narrative of 2030

So I've started to think of what a story might be.  And how I could show the journey of one person through my vision of the future, and my architectural intervention.  Here is the story of Bob.


My name is bob.  I’m originally from the country, but because of the employment market, I find myself in Brisbane, a modern city; moreover, a modern city with free energy.  Due to the discovery of fusion energy, the lens in which we view the city has changed.  No longer worried about CO2 and other green issues, we instead embrace the future without pollution due to free, clean energy.

Building has exploded in the city, with developers no longer bound by energy consumption and pollution worries, towers are everywhere.  Because energy is free, building costs are reduced, manufacturing and even material gathering became cheaper, and instead now the focus is on the finite resources that we have left on earth, and the cost of labour.

As recycling is virtually free, there is a movement on gathering resources from previously ignored sources.  Dump mining has begun in previously discarded City dumps, and buildings are now built with the focus on recyclable, reusable materials, and permanency of the core and structure of the building with the tenancy and uses being left loose to make building more sustainable.

As energy is free, the use of everyday technology such as mobiles and laptops has become almost obsolete with more and more people embracing augmented computing technology as a way of life.  With free energy, technology advancements accelerate at a tremendous rate, although there is always the thought of minimal material use in mind, energy is the main currency of technology.

People purchase augmenters such as glasses, and with these technologies there view of the world is changed.  No-longer relying on hardware updates, we crave new software, interfaces, and ultimately, a different augment of our fixed reality.  We add not just information but even completely modify the view of our world.  Personalization becomes the focus, and an extension of this is making our sub-conscious lens of the world a conscious decision.  We see what we want when we want to.  Some people wanting the immersion of the city with their HUD showing the bargains and events, some focused on social aspects, but some, like me, choosing to ignore the current and reinvent my reality.

Relationships are different to; with the idea of Facebook of the naughties being taken to the next level.  We rarely interact physically, choosing to instead interface through our technology with each other.  Online gaming that was once marginal becomes the sport of the future; Koreans having already embraced this idea in the 90’s are leading the world with the immersive gaming technology.  We are all online.

But we still crave personal contact, even if it is just for procreation, or a no string sexual encounter.  Pop-up love hotels are becoming more and more popular; the idea first blew me away, without the need for small talk tho, it caught on like wild fire.  We no longer feel the need for relationships that aren’t “fun” instead we rely on technology to serve, and people to entertain.  Glory holes are the new clubs.

Shopping is dead to; people instead looking at it as entertainment.  We click, scan and experience in the shop, but ultimately, everything is delivered and nothing is in store.  Apple starting this idea 20 years ago, but it’s taken to a new level.  We shop in passing; retail space is reduced to a mere façade of what it used to be.  But due to the cheaper manufacturing and transport cost with a relatively stable average income, we are all consuming animals devouring commercialism relentlessly.

Even the humble service providers of old are mechanised and energised.  What once had staff is now reduced to a mechanical line without any human interaction.  We purchase with a swipe of our wrists and cash has become obsolete, instead an online, digital credit system is the new way.  In my favourite diner spot “Slice of Sausage” in my buildings ground floor, the pizza man is no-longer there.  Instead the only employee is the delivery guy, which due to our lazy, online culture is working harder than ever before.  Delivery is the biggest sector in the employment market; followed closely by design.

As most in the city are devoured by new developments of towers reaching the sky, existing structures refitted and refurbished, mine is one of the first of the new breed.  A new site in the city that opened up due to the cities virtual heritage policy, it is new from the ground up.  No-longer held up by the requirement to keep facades of old regardless of significants, develops are left to grow, grow, grow.  The structure is built to last, with sustainability still being a key focus due to the ever pressing reality that materials are finite, however the dinosaur tower model of energy wasting towers becomes the norm.  The structure is designed to last at least 100 years, with the fit out of each floor becoming dependant on the inhabitants.  No longer is renting apartments normal, instead we rent tower amenity, and service and are now responsible for fitting our own space out.

Unit spaces are tiny, with single apartments becoming the standard.  No longer caring for energy wastage, we use glass everywhere.  Even internally with through the use of technologies, have a layer of screen imprinted on the glass, so with the use of more energy they are transformed into display screens used to show whatever our hearts desire.  My unit is small, very small.

At only 20m2 it is average, but on my salary, it’s all I could afford to lease and fit out.  All the materials used are generally reused off previous fit outs and tenancies due to the standardisation of wall panel sizing’s through the building.  But while small, it has everything I need.  A bathroom, a kitchen and my living space; everything transforms into what I need when I need it.  The wall a screen for my work as a produce agent; which is my TV, computer, and my view; with a very poor view of the street not stopping me, I have a view of Paris, or New York, whatever I want really.  My bed is the couch, my seat, and my kitchen everything I need.

As most people order in, the need for big kitchens with lots of appliances become obsolete, instead we use the very least and require the very least.  A microwave to reheat, a small fridge, and a recycle centre; we recycle everything, nothing is ever binned again.
I can’t help but think that I no-longer need to be here, but, without the need for farms, the inland of Australia has been all but abandoned, and at the moment, that sounds just perfect to me.  But how would I live without free energy??? 

Augmented Me!

The future is now!

http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2010/
mar/21/augmented-reality-iphone-advertising
Well if the marketing people are to be believed, but, maybe they are right.  I mean, when I was a kid, the thought of a heads up display being possible was the stuff of dreams.  How cool would it be to have facts about what you’re looking at just beamed into your vision!

http://augreality.pbworks.com/w/page/
9469035/Definition%20and%20key%
20information%20on%20AR
This desire obviously stems from an unhealthy need to know everything, but as designers, to know is to inform.  So I’ve always kept an eye on developments, and to be honest, they were slow and quite unrealistic, what was once suggested that a backpack full of a desktop pc and a bike helmet with an old TV screen hanging in your view was a start, the evolution into laptop with a recycled screen on goggles.
http://itlounge.eu/wsjs-exclusive-project
-glass-trial-promising-but-disorienting-
and-uncomfortable-project-glass/

But now Google glass is here!   A pair of glasses that tell you weather information, messages, video chat, GPS data and even transport info to help steer you to work faster, and keep you in touch with friends at a shake of the head. 

This is awesome, so the future is here, but how far can we take it?

Reference

Where from here?


http://infoactiv.com.au/2011/11/08/austr
alian-ewaste-regulations-now-in-place/
So, where to go?

I think the only way to explain my idea is through a narative; a day in the life of the average "future-man". 
I think the key ideas I need to cover are almost obvious, but maybe not.  

http://www.mumpreneursonline.com/affil
iate/10-work-from-home-ideas-for-mums
I think I should start with what the drivers are, that free energy has refocused society of the concern for the finite material resources we have and has made us focus on recycling and reusing more than ever.

So then we need a look at the city, the urban, the street, the pedestrian; Brisbane zooming into the future.  What has society become?  What is our culture?  How do we interact?  How do we work?  How do we relate to each other?
http://learn-how-to-be-happy.com/

But I think the most important issue is this; are we happy?

Only time will tell.

Architecture is temporary…




http://gabelafastoe.blogspot.com.au/2011/04/rome.html
At least, it is in most senses.  Other than the place you live, architectural is a temporal experience, like a meal or a drink, it’s only an experience while you’re enjoying it; then and there.  Once you leave, it’s over; done and dusted; just a memory for you to relive and enjoy.
http://cognacs.wordpress.com/2010/11/21/cognac-
cocktails-the-dra-kahlua-combines-kahlua-cognac-triple-sec-and-lemon-juice/
So a building like the pantheon for me, even if the building stands for thousands of years; it’s fleeting in my mind because I’ve only been once, and if I don’t go again, it’s not there.  So really I’m talking metaphysically, the experience of my time there, not just the longevity of materials.  While most architecture is a material thing, it’s not experienced on a material level for more than the time taken within.

So, architecture is temporary, well at least in my mind.  So if we are looking at architecture as a passing experience than it is more than just the materials of the walls and the sustainability elements slapped on the roof, it’s the smells, the sounds, the population of the space; its everything that we as architects have very limited control over.

So if we cannot control it, then what are we to do?

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Framework_-_
Zeppelin_Museum_Friedrichshafen_-_DSC06840.jpg
 
So maybe we need to develop a framework or a system in which the space exists, not just an envelope, structure and stuff, but a lifestyle event generator; an event space that is activated in a systematic way maybe; or maybe a blank canvas in which the experience is the population changing the space through use and abuse.