A Narrative of 2030

So I've started to think of what a story might be.  And how I could show the journey of one person through my vision of the future, and my architectural intervention.  Here is the story of Bob.


My name is bob.  I’m originally from the country, but because of the employment market, I find myself in Brisbane, a modern city; moreover, a modern city with free energy.  Due to the discovery of fusion energy, the lens in which we view the city has changed.  No longer worried about CO2 and other green issues, we instead embrace the future without pollution due to free, clean energy.

Building has exploded in the city, with developers no longer bound by energy consumption and pollution worries, towers are everywhere.  Because energy is free, building costs are reduced, manufacturing and even material gathering became cheaper, and instead now the focus is on the finite resources that we have left on earth, and the cost of labour.

As recycling is virtually free, there is a movement on gathering resources from previously ignored sources.  Dump mining has begun in previously discarded City dumps, and buildings are now built with the focus on recyclable, reusable materials, and permanency of the core and structure of the building with the tenancy and uses being left loose to make building more sustainable.

As energy is free, the use of everyday technology such as mobiles and laptops has become almost obsolete with more and more people embracing augmented computing technology as a way of life.  With free energy, technology advancements accelerate at a tremendous rate, although there is always the thought of minimal material use in mind, energy is the main currency of technology.

People purchase augmenters such as glasses, and with these technologies there view of the world is changed.  No-longer relying on hardware updates, we crave new software, interfaces, and ultimately, a different augment of our fixed reality.  We add not just information but even completely modify the view of our world.  Personalization becomes the focus, and an extension of this is making our sub-conscious lens of the world a conscious decision.  We see what we want when we want to.  Some people wanting the immersion of the city with their HUD showing the bargains and events, some focused on social aspects, but some, like me, choosing to ignore the current and reinvent my reality.

Relationships are different to; with the idea of Facebook of the naughties being taken to the next level.  We rarely interact physically, choosing to instead interface through our technology with each other.  Online gaming that was once marginal becomes the sport of the future; Koreans having already embraced this idea in the 90’s are leading the world with the immersive gaming technology.  We are all online.

But we still crave personal contact, even if it is just for procreation, or a no string sexual encounter.  Pop-up love hotels are becoming more and more popular; the idea first blew me away, without the need for small talk tho, it caught on like wild fire.  We no longer feel the need for relationships that aren’t “fun” instead we rely on technology to serve, and people to entertain.  Glory holes are the new clubs.

Shopping is dead to; people instead looking at it as entertainment.  We click, scan and experience in the shop, but ultimately, everything is delivered and nothing is in store.  Apple starting this idea 20 years ago, but it’s taken to a new level.  We shop in passing; retail space is reduced to a mere façade of what it used to be.  But due to the cheaper manufacturing and transport cost with a relatively stable average income, we are all consuming animals devouring commercialism relentlessly.

Even the humble service providers of old are mechanised and energised.  What once had staff is now reduced to a mechanical line without any human interaction.  We purchase with a swipe of our wrists and cash has become obsolete, instead an online, digital credit system is the new way.  In my favourite diner spot “Slice of Sausage” in my buildings ground floor, the pizza man is no-longer there.  Instead the only employee is the delivery guy, which due to our lazy, online culture is working harder than ever before.  Delivery is the biggest sector in the employment market; followed closely by design.

As most in the city are devoured by new developments of towers reaching the sky, existing structures refitted and refurbished, mine is one of the first of the new breed.  A new site in the city that opened up due to the cities virtual heritage policy, it is new from the ground up.  No-longer held up by the requirement to keep facades of old regardless of significants, develops are left to grow, grow, grow.  The structure is built to last, with sustainability still being a key focus due to the ever pressing reality that materials are finite, however the dinosaur tower model of energy wasting towers becomes the norm.  The structure is designed to last at least 100 years, with the fit out of each floor becoming dependant on the inhabitants.  No longer is renting apartments normal, instead we rent tower amenity, and service and are now responsible for fitting our own space out.

Unit spaces are tiny, with single apartments becoming the standard.  No longer caring for energy wastage, we use glass everywhere.  Even internally with through the use of technologies, have a layer of screen imprinted on the glass, so with the use of more energy they are transformed into display screens used to show whatever our hearts desire.  My unit is small, very small.

At only 20m2 it is average, but on my salary, it’s all I could afford to lease and fit out.  All the materials used are generally reused off previous fit outs and tenancies due to the standardisation of wall panel sizing’s through the building.  But while small, it has everything I need.  A bathroom, a kitchen and my living space; everything transforms into what I need when I need it.  The wall a screen for my work as a produce agent; which is my TV, computer, and my view; with a very poor view of the street not stopping me, I have a view of Paris, or New York, whatever I want really.  My bed is the couch, my seat, and my kitchen everything I need.

As most people order in, the need for big kitchens with lots of appliances become obsolete, instead we use the very least and require the very least.  A microwave to reheat, a small fridge, and a recycle centre; we recycle everything, nothing is ever binned again.
I can’t help but think that I no-longer need to be here, but, without the need for farms, the inland of Australia has been all but abandoned, and at the moment, that sounds just perfect to me.  But how would I live without free energy??? 

Augmented Me!

The future is now!

http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2010/
mar/21/augmented-reality-iphone-advertising
Well if the marketing people are to be believed, but, maybe they are right.  I mean, when I was a kid, the thought of a heads up display being possible was the stuff of dreams.  How cool would it be to have facts about what you’re looking at just beamed into your vision!

http://augreality.pbworks.com/w/page/
9469035/Definition%20and%20key%
20information%20on%20AR
This desire obviously stems from an unhealthy need to know everything, but as designers, to know is to inform.  So I’ve always kept an eye on developments, and to be honest, they were slow and quite unrealistic, what was once suggested that a backpack full of a desktop pc and a bike helmet with an old TV screen hanging in your view was a start, the evolution into laptop with a recycled screen on goggles.
http://itlounge.eu/wsjs-exclusive-project
-glass-trial-promising-but-disorienting-
and-uncomfortable-project-glass/

But now Google glass is here!   A pair of glasses that tell you weather information, messages, video chat, GPS data and even transport info to help steer you to work faster, and keep you in touch with friends at a shake of the head. 

This is awesome, so the future is here, but how far can we take it?

Reference

Where from here?


http://infoactiv.com.au/2011/11/08/austr
alian-ewaste-regulations-now-in-place/
So, where to go?

I think the only way to explain my idea is through a narative; a day in the life of the average "future-man". 
I think the key ideas I need to cover are almost obvious, but maybe not.  

http://www.mumpreneursonline.com/affil
iate/10-work-from-home-ideas-for-mums
I think I should start with what the drivers are, that free energy has refocused society of the concern for the finite material resources we have and has made us focus on recycling and reusing more than ever.

So then we need a look at the city, the urban, the street, the pedestrian; Brisbane zooming into the future.  What has society become?  What is our culture?  How do we interact?  How do we work?  How do we relate to each other?
http://learn-how-to-be-happy.com/

But I think the most important issue is this; are we happy?

Only time will tell.

Architecture is temporary…




http://gabelafastoe.blogspot.com.au/2011/04/rome.html
At least, it is in most senses.  Other than the place you live, architectural is a temporal experience, like a meal or a drink, it’s only an experience while you’re enjoying it; then and there.  Once you leave, it’s over; done and dusted; just a memory for you to relive and enjoy.
http://cognacs.wordpress.com/2010/11/21/cognac-
cocktails-the-dra-kahlua-combines-kahlua-cognac-triple-sec-and-lemon-juice/
So a building like the pantheon for me, even if the building stands for thousands of years; it’s fleeting in my mind because I’ve only been once, and if I don’t go again, it’s not there.  So really I’m talking metaphysically, the experience of my time there, not just the longevity of materials.  While most architecture is a material thing, it’s not experienced on a material level for more than the time taken within.

So, architecture is temporary, well at least in my mind.  So if we are looking at architecture as a passing experience than it is more than just the materials of the walls and the sustainability elements slapped on the roof, it’s the smells, the sounds, the population of the space; its everything that we as architects have very limited control over.

So if we cannot control it, then what are we to do?

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Framework_-_
Zeppelin_Museum_Friedrichshafen_-_DSC06840.jpg
 
So maybe we need to develop a framework or a system in which the space exists, not just an envelope, structure and stuff, but a lifestyle event generator; an event space that is activated in a systematic way maybe; or maybe a blank canvas in which the experience is the population changing the space through use and abuse.

The Ephemeral...

Is the future of architecture set in concrete; or is it???
http://web.mit.edu/newsoffice/2008/zaragoza-tt0611.html
Do we need to have walls and floors, or is it something more temporary, something implied.  There has been great pavilions built using just water as a barrier to human movement, but is architecture more than just a obstacle more than a restriction on our choices.  Without something to shape our world, we have no architecture, but I don't think it need to be limited to just a solid, permanent solution.
The internet is a testament to that human ideal that the temporary is all we crave.  We like dynamic, ever changing world just as much as the same old thing; some more than others if Korean gaming statistics is anything to go by.

But maybe using digital tools, and the internet on a more physical scale rather than solely virtual, we can find something delightful, and architectural in the middle.  It only takes a look at some of the emerging technologies around the place than can show us how we can create a dynamic structure, using nothing more than energy.

http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=413076
The idea of using holograms is thought to be futuristic, and sci-fi, but I think it has a really important role in entertainment of the future.  Imagine instead of a event that, if we are all to see it, travels from city to city, or we travel to it, wasting a mountain of materials, and energy and labour; when you can hold just one festival, and broadcast that image, in the form of a hologram to cities, town, street, and even houses everywhere.

All you need is a good internet connection and a holographic projector.
The festival of the future is born.

http://blog.lmff.com.au/2011/02/08/five-festival-fashion-tips-from-lmff/
Holograms of your favorite artists, which you can see and even touch, surrounded by thousands of real spectators and 'virtual spectators' enjoying and experiencing the festival on your terms rather than the provider.  This would make the cost of the festival incredibly cheap as everyone involved virtually can pay a small nominal fee and it could be sponsored to further reduce the costs, not to mention the quality of a well rested, single show only performance.

http://www.yestefindeque.com/2009/08/dieselumusic-tour-2009.html
A world of festivals and events, at your very fingertips, virtually, visually, and most importantly, sustainability.

 Is this the festival of the future???

What is architecture???

So in constructing a future architecture, we need to consider the limitations, or for that matter; the lack of limitations.
http://dobby.dyndns.biz/constantamateur/2011/08/15/rent-money
-is-dead-money-or-how-we-all-aspire-to-be-derivatives-traders/

Architecture can be anything, it is anthropology, it is religion, pschyology, paper planes and everything in between.  It is anything we construct or invent for, with, or to ourselves.  It is time.
The underlying architect of the world is a relentless, emotionless beast that is time.  We cant change it stop it or speed it up.  And yet it governs everything we do, feel and see as without time, on a phylosophical level, we don't exist without it, and yet when we design a future scenario, it is thinking about time that makes it possible to imagine what people do.

http://www.globalnomads.eu/new-york-my-love/times-square


In a world that is truly 24hours a day, as the potential abundance of energy would create, a world without the need to follow the sun, but to create our own through the use of lighting.



So its thinking about how we could change the way we use time, through the use of changing the space, and in tern how the way we use it changes the space.  The shops and streets would be occupied all the time, no rest for any built environment, and it is with this idea we need to think of more sustainable ways in building and managing our environment that we create.  


It would not be possible to staff a city of today for 24 hours a day without a significant influx of labour.  So as this is not realistic, shopping would change into something more experiential, and less guided by a team of sales staff but by a few.  Shopping is no longer trawling through racks and racks of stock, when have a sit down and maybe having a drink as a projection of what your clothes look like on you would take up a lot less time and staff, not to mention less materials, and space.
http://www.freegreatpicture.com/jewelry/time-is-money-9944
So a 24 hour city is more concise.  It is more experiential.  It is personalized and individual, while coping with millions of others doing the same thing.

So working around the clock would have to be a norm, but not an equal amount of staff as today, but the same numbers spread over a day/night cycle.  And in doing this, we would need schools and other things to adapt to this modular society.  No-longer all on the same page of time, we would need to foresee the potential for changing everyone to a time-scale that suits their lifestyle.  That would change everything.
http://www.onestopwebmasters.com/top-10-refreshing-summer-wallpaper/


No longer would the cream jobs be about money, but instead lifestyle.  It would be a wealth of time that would dictate the well-off, and a mix of night hours, and a disrupted family cycle that would create the 'poor' of the future.

http://benderochie.wordpress.com/


Time would be the currency most sort after.  Money would still play a part in the job in question, but the time in which you work is the most important.  Efficiency would be brutal, and the efficiency of time is as we see today, become ever more necessary, would become dominant.  We could no-longer afford to slack off at work.  Minutes would be precious.  Economies would be global, as there would be no-longer a separate time scale on the money markets but 24/7.  But in all this as a possibility; I wonder how long it would last.


http://aquilakahecate.blogspot.com.au/2011/10/icarus-weighs-in.html
Would we in gathering unlimited energy, become a culture of Icarus.  Would we fly for too long too high and burn out?  Would be become extinct from working ourselves to death?  Would we want to be forever 'on'?

The power of energy...

So...What would happen???
spandex suit to start...
http://www.vashoo.com/Lady-Gaga-in-white-
spandex-bodysuit-in-Paparazzi-a-197.html
We rely that free energy would make our lives better, cheap, faster.  But what about the rest; what does it really change.
In discussions for project 1 we have looked at a series of changes, some radical, in order to explore what architecture could be, but also, what architecture means, and moreover, what happens to society and culture.  In business Labour, Energy and Materials are the three main inputs into any product.  And if the Energy/Basic Needs are met with free or virtually free inputs, the other two become key.  


Now if energy was free, energy intensive robotic labor saving devices could be employed; so labour hours would become prolific and available.  Whereas Materials are finite, now there is a scope of transmutation or very high energy methods to gain rare materials such as gold and diamonds, but on the whole, materials are finite.  


we could all be tupac...
http://mycoachella.mydesert.com/2012/04/18/tupac-hologram-
coachella-technology-mylar-screen-av-concepts/

So we imagine a world where reduction in material waste is the main driver in design and culture; energy to move, cool, heat or power a place is unlimited so all that remains is to reduce the size and quantity of things that aren't absolutely necessary, or really needed.
So we looked at cars being reduced to a small, self-driven, share-car.  And thats a simple solution, but for retail/clothing, and other areas, its more complicated.  Fashion chews up a massive amount of resources in manufacturing and sourcing material, where energy and therefor water is free, this is less of a problem, but the idea that we would have hundreds of pieces of clothing that need replacing every few years or so seems quite wasteful.  



So I was investigating that fashion, is not about the form, but maybe it becomes about the pattern or logo.  The image on the shirt rather than the shirt itself.  So maybe we inprint a screen of some sort into our clothes, so when we want to change the pieces design, we just upload a new design and the piece lives on.  

how bad a lack of power would be...
http://www.prlog.org/10708988-w
here-to-buy-spandex-bodysuits.html


But even further than that; maybe like a sci-fi dream, we all have spandex suits, but using holographic projections built in to the clothing, we look like we are wearing various forms of clothing whenever we want to change.  A virtual outfit in the material world.  It would be awesome.


Or maybe everyone in spandex is not a good idea...imaging how bad a power-outage would look...

Its all about the layers...

A building or any architectural idea is all about layers.  And as brand puts it, its all about "six S's"; Site, structure, skin, services, space plan, and stuff.
http://www.architecture.uwaterloo.ca/faculty_projects/terri/steel/skyscraper_chicago2.html
Site cannot be changed, it is the setting or location and is in most cases eternal.  Structure is the load bearing elements and this is the part of the building that if you want to follow a sustainability ideal, should be the element that lasts at least 100 years.  That way it saves you money and the environment, and lots of it, in the long run.  And this is something we don't do much in Australia, well in relation to residential architecture.  We build the cheapest result, with the cheapest material, and while it is renewable, it rots, gets eaten, and falls down quickly, in fact 25 years is the expected lifespan.  The skin, as suggested by brand, is replaced every 20 years or so, but if we were to design it to last, to age gracefully, and more importantly, work well than the need to replace at all becomes unnecessary.
Now services, there is not much we can do in the way of making the services last longer other than use quality components that have a long, efficient life.  But when it is time to change I take the words of Wheeler and say, "Loose fit, Long life".  We leave space and access for the services to be easily replaced, and in doing so, extend the life of the building until it is going to fall down or until the market dictates replacement.
http://www.theurbn.com/2012/04/sustainable-retreat/
Now space plan and stuff is doomed.  All that stuff is replaced every week > every few years so what can we do??
Well we can use green products and use them in such a way as to be reusable, and up-cycle-able.  A cradle to cradle approach.  This not only saves money, but the environment as well.
This is the main problem with green-washing I have; if you say its green people use it, but sustainability is more than just green products, its using any product or products regardless of there "green-ness" to make a intervention that will last a lifetime or more, rather than sound green and cost you endless amounts of money to heat and cool, but as long as it uses "renewable timber framing" its all great.
http://onlyinnewmexico.blogspot.com.au/2011/09/green-wash.html
So good design is sustainable, not for the products, but for the design.
And lets not forget what the word means for a second; Sustainable, the ability to sustain.
We can't sustain the house and land, brick and tile scourges any longer, not just for the green environments sake, but for my visual environments sake.
Reference:
Brand, S., 1997. Shearing Layers, in How buildings learn : what happens after they’re built, London: Phoenix Illustrated. pp12-23
Wheeler, T.,  2012.  Seven sensible sayings for green interiors, in Artichoke 39, Melbourne: Architectural Media Pty, Ltd.  pp58-59

What if energy was free???

So, what if it was?
http://sensualblissvoyager.wordpress.com/tag/energy/


I think that there is really only one thing stopping the world becoming equal, and that is energy. With free energy food, water, or any other basic needs will become absolutely plentiful forever. Unlimited resources for all. World poverty and hunger would forever cease. It is something that dreams are made of. As Greengold states "the cost of land vehicle transportation, which is so much of the focus in the press, would drop by 25%-35%. But, in addition, airline costs would plummet as much as 50%". (http://www.greengoldblog.com/2011/05/if-energy-were-free-and-unlimited.html). They go on to state "The price of food would drop and the availability of food would skyrocket. With free and unlimited energy, food could be grown affordably just about anywhere, given that water would be readily available and, where necessary, climate-controlled growing facilities would become inexpensive to operate".
So free energy would be revolutionary, but how?

At this point there is only a few potential options.

http://econews.com.au/tag/renewable-energy/
1:  We install lots and lots of renewable's such as thermal solar power plants, large wind turbine installations and share these resources from country to country to make renewable energy 24hours a day.  Rinse and repeat until there is a massive surplus in the world of energy.  It is possible, and given the outcomes seams actually a fairly cheap option.
http://www.dailytech.com/Purdue+Researchers+Test+New+
Coatings+for+Nuclear+Fusion+Reactors+/article19186.htm
2:  Nuclear Fusion.  This technology is forever "just around the corner" from becoming reliable.  If this technology would prove itself then it would be only the installation cost that the consumer/government would have to provide, afterwards, unlimited clean free energy.  And after building quite a few of them they become cheaper and cheaper until the entire world has access to this unlimited energy.  But this is still waiting on a break through in reliability.  So, time.
So, its only a matter of time, but will we live to see a world that is completely saturated with energy???
Reference:

Infrastructure...

http://www.treehugger.com/cars/kitakyushu-where-does-your-old-used-car-end-up.html
So the city evolves.
If we move the cars out, and enrich the walking experience of the city, what happens next? 
The street front then become less important, maybe the shopping experience moves out into the street.  The surface that once was a road becomes something freed from the shackles of the car.  It becomes a stage for food, cafe's, shops, performance spaces, cultural exchange, or something much more.  
http://www.euaustralia.com/2008/01/
It becomes a new way of experiencing a city.  The shop fronts then become less important; they maybe become the walkway themselves, opening up the shops once located within, out into the sunshine and fresh air.
http://www.actbus.net/forum/index.php?topic=963.0
But for this to happen, there needs to be a shift away from how the city works now into something else.  We need more infrastructure to support such a move, one that focuses on mass-transit rather than the car.  Gone will be the express-way's into the city, replaced by train lines and bus way's.  There would need to be suburban hubs where people can gather with express arteries into the city; while a whole network of other mass-transit options are needed to service pedestrians to the hubs.  And this is where a relatively cheap option of clearing the streets of cars becomes very expensive for a city that already lacks sustainable mass-transit.  It is at its maximum ability to service the city now, and the population will only increase exponentially. There are commuters from over 100km's away that need options, and unlike other major cities in Australia, we lack a train connection to most of these commuters.  What would be a beautiful idea needs support from government to re-invent the mass-transit for the whole south east of the state.
http://www.creative-va.com/workvirtual.html
Not that this cannot be done.  But if you get rid of the cars for the sake of the pedestrian spaces left behind, why not another idea.
Why not get rid of the need to even commute to the city or anywhere for that matter?
We already acknowledge that the online retail market is booming, and virtual technologies are fast become a reality; then what about not having to go to work at all?
Do we need to worry about a few streets for pedestrians when we can revolutionize the need for a city at all?

What Density???


http://abcdunlimited.com/ideas/suburbia.html
In looking at density of cities, it is hard to pick what is 'right'.  But there is certain areas of Brisbane that I've lived that I think nail what we should be doing more of or less of, depending on the results.
In the suburbs there is no amenity.  You have to drive everywhere, and I think this is because of the blobs of zoning rather than mixing them up.  There is no employment locally, and at 8am every morning there is a mass exodus from the neighbourhood; increasing the likelihood of crime ect.
Currently I live in a rural area, in a town of about 100 or so people.  There is a handful of jobs in the local area, enough to support a few families.  Farms are vast but are almost solely operated by the owning family.  I have to drive to do almost any shopping; and its not a short distance either.  I would love any mass transit, but as it stands while my local train station has 2 lines, they are only for the use of coal trains.  There used to be a train to Ipswich, but it is replaced by a rail bus once an hour to Rosewood, and then if it shows up, a train from Rosewood to Ipswich.  If I want to get to Brisbane, I need 2 Trains, a bus and over 2 hours.  It takes 1 hour to drive and I can walk from a park.  And while I drive I almost always have a passenger along for the ride.
http://property.mitula.com.au/property/for-rent-greenslopes-australia
Yet there once upon a time I lived at Stones Corner; a wonderfully multi-density festooned urban landscape full of amenity.  I could walk to a selection of super-markets, local shops, take-aways, 24hour shops, bus stops, train stations and a bike path to the city.  I walked everywhere.  There was a massive local park to go running in, and while the block size by today's standards is minuscule weighing in at 400sqm's; I had over 20 productive fruit tree's, more than a dozen chooks, a dog and 4 adults.  All this within a 100sqm house that was built cheaply about 100 years ago but incorporated smart design using light weight materials and cross-ventilation.  It was heaven. 
http://favim.com/image/44789/
So in having a small yard and smaller house, I am able to fit 10 times the density of outer suburbia and a myriad of employment and amenity all within walking distance.  We had it right a hundred years ago; so what happened???
I think the loss of sensible development is due to councils letting money-driven developers to make all the decisions.  What happened to governments governing???
What happened to density???

What is the Ideal???

http://www.pacificmagazines.com.au/Pages/Magazines/
Magazine.aspx?mid=d996964f-747d-44e1-912d-7c741325264d
Reading the latest issue of Monument would have you convinced that the future of cities in Australia is to wipe the slate clean and start again; or is it?
Its suggested that because of catashtophic weather conditions that we would abandon the east coast and settle in the Kimberley region, as this area would be flush with rainfall and fertile farming land.  While this idea is possibly a bit of a leap, the idea of the city function without cars is very interesting.
Through the shear lack of affordability of fuel, we ditch cars for bicycles and walking.  Electric vehicles make an appearance, but are limited to mass transit mainly.  The city buildings incorporate as much green or energy generation.  And instead of wasting spaces, it is suggested that every available space is taken up with shops, local produce stalls and cafe's.  The death of the car and fuel has dried out the population reducing alcohol consumption and has changed the culture to a walk and talk, sit and sip culture.  There is green space everywhere and health problems are a thing of the past due to the active lifestyle that the population take on.
I adore the notion but feel that there is no need for the dramatic loss of the east coast to start this reformation.  We need to embrace local living, eating and growing.  We need to encourage our city to serve us not ignore the world around and become internal.  We need to embrace a healthier lifestyle without being forced at gun point.  We need to make our cities walkable, breathable, and livable.  Not ignore the CBD for only a place to work and get drunk in.
We need to change; sooner rather than later.  Or do we have to wait for the world to end to believe we can?

The Ants around a Sugar-cube...

http://ambassadorpestm.blogspot.com.au/
The thought of taking the CBD streets off cars is not a new one; but I think it is already happening, with or without a congestion tax.  And that is through simply charging way too much for parking.
The streets of Brisbane are all but cleared of parks for bus zones, taxi zones, loading zones, clearways and no standing.  And the ones left are $4 an hour minimum.  The multilevel parking facilities don't offer an alternative either, with some charging up to $40 an hour!
So even now, the cost of entering the city with a vehicle is causing a mass zoning of parking out of the city and busing or ferrying it the last little bit.  The areas of kangaroo point, west end and Toowong/UQ are heavily abused by city working drivers now, and in the future only putting limited time meters is going to stop it.  The ants around the sugar-cube effect.
http://guyism.com/lifestyle/guilty-pleasures-
men-usually-wont-admit-to.html/attachment/
man-shopping-online
http://daydaily.com/2012/07/23/women-
shoe-shopping-turning-the-chore-into-fun/
This guy shops online.
http://forum.santabanta.com/showthread.htm?
189613-Male-bras-give-man-B00Bs-a-makeover
In the Suburban talk we looked at gender specific shopping.  Girls like the experience of shopping, possibly in groups as a social thing, whereas guys tend to know what size they are and dont really enjoy trying stuff on or lots of customer service attention so as a result men are fast becoming the bulk of the online shoppers.  The call of guilt free purchasing without judgment is probably too much for some, but also, guys don't like to try different stuff on, we develop a style and stick with it.  Just look at how many middle-aged men in the city still look like they come out of the 80's.  Yet woman like staying on top of latest trends and looking fresh and young, this is probably from our skewed view of what is beautiful.

http://www.blakeralph.com/woodford-festival



http://panoptikal.blogspot.com.au/2009_09_01_archive.html
Looking at making Woodford self-sustainable we looked at making the music scene in Woodford sustainable by having the folk festival every weekend, and attaching a music school and also a creative arts school to facilitate ongoing talent and a place for musicians of Brisbane to release their music to the world.
In developing this idea we suggested that the stage be the center of the new university and the buildings organically spread out from the center that is the stage.  We likened this to the development of European cities, like Milan, organically from the place of worship in the middle, fronted by a square for congregation, surrounded by supporting development.
From these insights we developed quite far out and futuristic technologically driven outcomes, and this helped with my own personal development.
Wait for future installments to see where I'm heading...